Minggu, 25 Februari 2024

'Liz Truss's tax cuts would have worked wonderfully for Britain' - The Telegraph

Britain faces “destitution” if Chancellor Jeremy Hunt does not cut taxes, one of America’s most prominent economists has warned.

Arthur Laffer, known for his Laffer Curve tax theory and a former adviser to two US presidents, said Mr Hunt will cripple the UK economy if he does not take steps to reduce Britain’s tax burden.

In an interview with The Telegraph, Mr Laffer said: “You’ll be reversing back to the days of destitution in Britain, if you could continue to have those high tax rates.”

Britain’s tax burden is on track to become larger than at any time since the Second World War, according to forecasts from the Government’s fiscal watchdog.

The burden is rising because income tax thresholds have been frozen until 2028. It means millions of people will be dragged into higher tax brackets as their salaries rise, an effect known as fiscal drag.

Mr Laffer, 83, said a failure to reduce the burden would return Britain to the 1970s when the country was forced into a bailout by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Then, Britain was crippled by runaway inflation and low growth, sparking a run on the pound. The highest income tax rate at the time stood at 83pc.

Mr Laffer said: “If you keep raising the highest rate and have more inflation and don’t index the tax [thresholds], you will be moving back towards those days pre-Thatcher.”

He urged the Chancellor to use his upcoming Budget to scrap the top rate of income tax, arguing it would “be a very major benefit to the country.”

Fiscal drag means an extra three million people will be paying the higher rate of tax by the end of the decade, while an additional 400,000 will be forced to pay the top rate charged at 45pc on earnings above £125,141.

Mr Laffer said the rise in the number of people paying the top rate would be the biggest barrier to economic growth.

He said: “The top rate is far more important for the economy than cutting lower rates. It is much more important.”

Mr Laffer is known as the modern father of supply-side economics – the theory that the best way to achieve economic growth is through low taxes, low regulation and free trade.

The root of his fame began with a napkin in 1974. Then, America was mired in “stagflation”, or the toxic combination of inflation and stagnant growth. In a meeting with several advisers to President Gerald Ford at the Two Continents restaurant in Washington, Mr Laffer made a rudimentary sketch of what became known as the Laffer Curve – an illustration of the relationship between tax rates and government revenues.

It visualises the idea that high taxes can be self-defeating. The curve shows that, initially, rising tax rates boosts government income. But at a certain point, as the rates get higher, the returns start to diminish. This is because high taxes begin to trigger behavioural changes: wealthy individuals move abroad, or pay more into their pensions; businesses decide not to invest.

“What do these rich people do? When you raise the tax rate on them, they change their behaviour. They hire lawyers, they hire accountants. They hire deferred income specialists. They hire business planners, they hire lobbyists,” Mr Laffer said.

The concept long pre-dated Mr Laffer. The 14th century Arab philosopher Ibn Khaldun, Scottish Enlightenment economist Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes had all expressed similar arguments.

Arthur Laffer pictured with Ronald Reagan
Arthur Laffer was an adviser to Ronald Reagan in the 1980s Credit: Bettmann

However, it was Mr Laffer who fired the idea into Republican ideology. After the napkin, the Republicans became the party of tax cuts. Mr Laffer went on to serve as a member of President Ronald Reagan’s Economic Policy Advisory Board in the 1980s. In 2016, he was an economic adviser to Donald Trump’s election campaign.

The theory remains relevant. In December, the Scottish National Party announced plans to raise the top rate of Scottish income tax from 47pc to 48pc. In theory, this should bring in an extra £53m in tax revenues, according to the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC). In practice, the watchdog expects so much behavioural change that the gain for the Scottish taxman will in fact only be £8m.

Mr Laffer’s proposal to scrap the top rate of tax in Britain is unlikely to land well at the Treasury, given the ill-fated September 2022 mini-Budget. Then prime minister Liz Truss and chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng announced plans to, among other things, abolish the UK’s 45pc top tax rate.

It was billed as “the Growth Plan” but imploded spectacularly. Mr Kwarteng was sacked and Ms Truss was forced to reverse course days later after markets effectively exploded. Gilt yields soared as investors lost confidence in Britain, betting that the unfunded tax cuts would drive up inflation and government debt. Ms Truss’s premiership lasted only a few weeks longer.

Mr Laffer is adamant that Ms Truss’s mini-Budget was the right approach, however poorly executed the plan was.

“It was an excellent thing,” he said. “The thing that was not excellent was that it didn’t get implemented. It’s amazing how tax cuts don’t work until they’re actually put into effect. If it had been tested, it would have worked wonderfully for Britain.”

Other economists may disagree but nobody can deny that the British economy needs growth.

The UK tipped into a technical recession at the end of last year and, while early data suggests the downturn is already over, the outlook remains anaemic. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects the economy to grow by just 0.6pc this year.

The contrast with the US is stark, where the IMF has forecast 2.1pc growth in 2024.

The UK and Europe have been left scrambling to find an answer to President Joe Biden’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which has injected $500bn into the economy through spending and tax breaks designed to reduce carbon emissions and improve healthcare.

Despite strong growth, Mr Laffer is critical of President Biden’s approach. He believes the President is inflating an economic bubble that will burst.

He said: “Biden doesn’t understand economics. We have been way overspending. In my view, the key to prosperity is spending restraint. Joe Biden has been the antithesis of spending restraint. 

“I’m for reducing government spending and reducing tax rates and letting markets really drive the system.”

President Biden is likely to face Mr Trump in the upcoming November election and Mr Laffer said a second Trump presidency would likely see a similar economic approach to his first.

Then, Mr Trump cut the top rate of tax from 39.6pc to 37pc – a move that President Biden has proposed reversing in spending plans he released last March.

Mr Trump’s top rate tax cuts had more success than Ms Truss’s. So did Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s. When she came to power in 1979, the top rate was 83pc. By the end of her premiership, it was 40pc. 

“That led to an extraordinary period of exceptional growth and prosperity in the UK,” Mr Laffer said.

Baroness Thatcher was a personal friend.

“She and Sir Dennis used to stay at our house in California when she came to the US,” Mr Laffer recalled. “I’ve got all of these pictures of her hugging my kids.”

Mr Laffer would have dinner with her twice a year at her home in Chester Square after her premiership.

“She wasn’t this austere piece of marble. She was a person with a personality and with feelings and humour and sadness. And she was very, very real.”

A Treasury spokesman said: “We will not speculate on whether further tax cuts will be affordable in the upcoming Budget, however our tax burden remains lower than any major European economy and inflation has more than halved.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9idXNpbmVzcy8yMDI0LzAyLzI1L2JyaXRhaW4tZmFjZXMtZGVzdGl0dXRpb24taHVudC1uby10YXgtY3V0cy1hcnRodXItbGFmZmVyL9IBAA?oc=5

2024-02-25 12:00:00Z
CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9idXNpbmVzcy8yMDI0LzAyLzI1L2JyaXRhaW4tZmFjZXMtZGVzdGl0dXRpb24taHVudC1uby10YXgtY3V0cy1hcnRodXItbGFmZmVyL9IBAA

Reports of lower energy bills have been greatly exaggerated - The Telegraph

From April, households using an average amount of energy will face an annual bill of £1,690 for their combined gas and electricity – down from £1,928 between January and March.

Ofgem’s decision to lower the household energy price cap by 12pc means a saving of £238 a year for the typical household. But given that the price cap is set on a quarterly basis, with this newly announced level in place until the end of June, it makes more sense to think of an average saving of around £20 a month.

And while gas and electricity bills will fall for around 29m households from the start of April, the actual amount you pay still depends on how much you use, as the cap is on unit rates, not on your total bill.

For all the positive headlines, though, electricity costs in the UK remain extremely high by international standards – bad news not only for households, but also for British manufacturers.

Bills are also way above where they were before Russia invaded Ukraine two years ago, causing turmoil on global energy markets. 

During January, domestic end-user electricity prices averaged 29.08 c€/kWh (euro cents per kilowatt hour) in France and just 22.04 c€/kWh in Spain. In the UK, the average was up at 40.73 c€/kWh – some 62pc above the European Union average.

In the US, while there is variation from state to state, average domestic electricity prices were the equivalent of just 16.27 c€/kWh last month. This at least partly reflects America’s success in transforming itself from a major importer to a major exporter of energy, a change driven by the impact of the fracking revolution on US oil and gas industry output. 

Back in 2020, the last full year before signs of escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine started spooking global energy markets, UK electricity prices averaged around 27.15 c€/kWh – a third lower than now. 

Lingering high energy costs are a major reason why UK inflation remains at 4pc, double the Bank of England’s target. The comparable figures in the US and eurozone are 3.1pc and 2.8pc respectively, reflecting much lower electricity costs.

One reason UK electricity is so expensive is that wholesale energy costs – which have fallen sharply since the height of the Russia-Ukraine conflict – make up just half of the average household gas and electricity bill. Along with VAT at 5pc, and energy companies’ (relatively modest) profit margins, UK customers also pay hefty “policy costs” and even larger “network costs”.

“Policy costs”, according to Ofgem, are “levies that support low carbon generation, energy efficiency and vulnerable customers”. “Network costs”, meanwhile, reflect further subsidies to the renewables industry which, in turn, reflect the UK’s “marginal-cost electricity-pricing model”.

Over recent years, wind, solar and other renewables have generated around two fifths of the UK’s electricity – roughly the same as gas-fired power stations. Coal is now used to generate only around 2pc of our electricity, down from 35pc just 20 years ago.

But “cheap” renewables, far from cutting consumer energy bills, are pushing prices up. That’s because renewables still depend heavily on subsidies to get the wind turbines built and the solar panels up and running.

The UK’s now renewable-heavy energy mix also needs to have a large fleet of gas-fired power stations on standby – so they are there, ready to be fired up on days when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun doesn’t shine. The alternative is that the lights go out – with all the economic and societal chaos that would involve.

Such “intermittent” periods can last weeks in the UK, especially during winter, when energy demand is high. 

But having gas-fired stations on standby to facilitate the more extensive use of renewables is hugely expensive – as the sky-high fixed costs of being able to produce energy at short notice are spread across much smaller revenues, given that the gas-fired stations in question are, for long-periods, standing idle.

Even on days when it is sunny and windy, UK electricity prices are driven by the marginal cost of generation – that is, the spot price of gas. And the shift to renewables is significantly inflating this marginal cost, pushing up household bills too – whatever we’re told about “low cost” renewable energy.

For now, renewable companies make serious money from the very intermittency problems they’re meant to be solving. The government meanwhile takes a big slice – via a low-key but hefty renewable windfall tax.

As such, the operation of our renewable-heavy electricity market has seriously aggravated the cost of living crisis. Yet rather than reforming this pricing system, easing household bills, the government raids renewable profits – an ever-increasing household energy “stealth tax”.

It is in this context of high energy prices despite years of subsidies to renewable providers that the question of how we get to net zero – and who pays – is becoming increasingly hotly debated. Reaching the 2050 target has enormous cost implications not only for households and firms, but also the Government.

Between now and mid-century, subsidies and other “green investment” will add 21 percentage points to the UK’s national debt-to-GDP ratio, according to a little-noticed Office for Budget Responsibility report published last year. In today’s money, that’s equivalent to £500bn.

Just last week, Olivier Blanchard, former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund told the House of Lords economic affairs committee that transitioning to a low-carbon economy, while “necessary”, will be “much more expensive than people imagine” with a “substantial fiscal cost to achieve anything close to net zero”.

Sir Dieter Helm, Oxford economics professor and another highly respected voice, meanwhile told peers it was “delusory to think” that the net zero transition would pay for itself – as many politicians, from all the main parties, continue to claim.

The process of spreading around the vast costs of net zero 2050 is becoming increasingly politically contentious. Any government wanting support for such targets must find a way to ensure renewables start delivering much cheaper energy bills.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiamh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9idXNpbmVzcy8yMDI0LzAyLzI1L2dvdmVybm1lbnRzLW11c3Qtc2xhc2gtZW5lcmd5LWJpbGxzLW1lZXQtbmV0LXplcm8tdGFyZ2V0cy_SAQA?oc=5

2024-02-25 06:00:00Z
CBMiamh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9idXNpbmVzcy8yMDI0LzAyLzI1L2dvdmVybm1lbnRzLW11c3Qtc2xhc2gtZW5lcmd5LWJpbGxzLW1lZXQtbmV0LXplcm8tdGFyZ2V0cy_SAQA

Hundreds of thousands of people could be eligible for cost-of-living payment - The Independent

Hundreds of thousands of pensioners have been urged to check if they are eligible for a sizeable cost-of-living payment that ends next month.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said about 880,000 eligible UK households can secure an extra £299 if they claim pension credit by March 5.

Pension Credit averages more than £3,900 a year and aims to help low-income individuals who have reached state pension age with their day-to-day expenses.

It guarantees a minimum weekly income of £201.05 for single pensioners and £306.85 for couples, while additional help is available for those with disabilities or caring responsibilities.

About 1.4 million pensioners already receive pension credit in the UK.

The state pension is due to rise by 8.5% in April, when the new full state pension will be worth £221.20 weekly.

The DWP previously sent 2,000 people letters inviting them to apply for pension credit as part of a trial last July.

Minister for Pensions, Paul Maynard, said: “We are committed to ensuring every pensioner receives the financial support available to them.

“Anyone who is unsure whether they or a loved one is entitled to pension credit should quickly check using our online pension credit calculator – it’s never been easier.

“Not only could this secure an extra £3,900 every year and unlock a whole host of other support, if successfully claimed by 5 March a further £299 Cost of Living boost is up for grabs.”

You can claim for pension credit by visiting https://www.gov.uk/pension-credit/how-to-claim or by calling 0800 99 1234.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2Nvc3Qtb2YtbGl2aW5nLXBheW1lbnQtdWstMjAyNC1kd3AtY3JlZGl0LWIyNTAxOTQ3Lmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2024-02-25 00:13:56Z
CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2Nvc3Qtb2YtbGl2aW5nLXBheW1lbnQtdWstMjAyNC1kd3AtY3JlZGl0LWIyNTAxOTQ3Lmh0bWzSAQA

Sabtu, 24 Februari 2024

Worst airlines for customer satisfaction revealed | UK News - Sky News

The worst airlines for customer satisfaction have been revealed

The UK's flag carrier airline, British Airways, ranked among the worst airlines in the survey.

BA's customer score for long-haul flights was the joint third lowest out of 17 carriers analysed by Which?, at 59%.

The airline received just two stars out of five for boarding experience and value for money, and achieved three stars for the other six categories assessed.

For short-haul flights, British Airways' score was 56%, which was the fifth lowest among 22 airlines.

At the other end of the spectrum, the best airline for long-haul flights was Singapore Airlines (83%) and for short-haul Jet2.com (81%) took the top spot.

The worst performers in the long-haul ranking were Lufthansa (56%), Air Canada (58%), American Airlines (59%) and British Airways.

More on British Airways

The pilot was reportedly left 'penniless'
Image: Pic: PA

Wizz Air (44%) was ranked bottom for short-haul flights for the second year in a row, followed by Ryanair (47%), Iberia (49%) and Vueling (53%).

Which? said the standard of service last year often "fell well short of the mark", with many passengers struggling to get support when they needed it.

UK air fares reached record highs in 2023.

Read more from Sky News:
Heaters sold on TikTok and Temu 'could explode'
Tesco Bank sold to Barclays in deal worth up to £1bn
British Airways pilot 'kidnapped and tortured'

Rory Boland, editor of magazine Which? Travel, said: "Air fares have soared in recent years, and the bare minimum passengers should expect in return for their hard-earned cash is a reliable service, with friendly, easy to access customer support when they are let down.

"While the likes of Jet2 continue to excel in this regard, our survey shows that passengers of many airlines are sadly being shortchanged - with high rates of last minute cancellations, abysmal customer service and sneaky extra fees for luggage hiking up the final price."

A British Airways spokesperson said: "We always work hard to get our customers to where they need to be on time.

"We apologise to customers for any disruption they've faced during these challenging periods and again thank them for their understanding."

Marion Geoffroy, UK managing director at Wizz Air, said: "We do not consider the findings of this report to be representative or the methodology used to be transparent.

"Only 124 Wizz Air passengers were surveyed, while Which? spoke to several thousand people who had flown with some of our competitors."

The survey of Which? members was conducted in October last year and relates to more than 10,000 flights with customer scores based on overall satisfaction and the likelihood to recommend an airliner to a friend.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3dvcnN0LWFpcmxpbmVzLWZvci1jdXN0b21lci1zYXRpc2ZhY3Rpb24tcmV2ZWFsZWQtMTMwNzk2MTjSAQA?oc=5

2024-02-24 04:23:21Z
CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3dvcnN0LWFpcmxpbmVzLWZvci1jdXN0b21lci1zYXRpc2ZhY3Rpb24tcmV2ZWFsZWQtMTMwNzk2MTjSAQA

The best and worst airlines for 2024 named by Which? - Jet2 is No.1 for third time and BA is among the worst - Daily Mail

British Airways was once so confident of its reputation, it used ‘the world’s favourite airline’ in its advertising campaigns.

But the UK’s flag-carrier has been voted among the worst airlines for both long and short haul travel.

Consumer champion Which? surveyed travellers’ experiences of flying in the past year and analysed results from over 10,000 flights.

Once among the country’s leading airlines, BA came in the bottom five for short haul flights - below a number of low-cost carriers including easyJet, and in the bottom three for long haul.

Punctuality and cancellations were a particular issue, with 3.3 per cent of its flights cancelled at short notice, according to CAA data.

Consumer champion Which? surveyed travellers’ experiences of flying in the past year and analysed results from over 10,000 flights

From 1983 to 2001, BA based its advertising around its claim that it was the ‘world’s favourite airline’. However, it has since fallen out of favour.

Aviation expert Alex McWhirter told The Mail: ‘BA has had to cut back on standards in order to compete with low-cost carriers. If it wants to go back to the good old days of food and drink service on board it will have to increase prices but customers won’t pay those prices.

‘Because of the image cultivated over the years, people expect more from a national carrier like BA, but these days they’re disappointed.’

The airline suffered a major IT failure in May 2017 and again in March 2022, causing dozens of flights to be grounded.

At the time, BA’s chief executive Sean Doyle apologised to staff, saying: ‘Many of our customers are rightly fed up. I know you’re also fed up and I’m as frustrated as you are with some of the things we’ve had to deal with.’

In the Which? survey, passengers rated airlines on seven criteria, including customer service, value for money, seat comfort and food and drink. A customer score was calculated based on overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend.

Once among the country’s leading airlines, BA came in the bottom five for short haul flights - below a number of low-cost carriers including easyJet, and in the bottom three for long haul

Wizz Air finished bottom, marking its second consecutive year at the bottom of the survey, with customers complaining about delays and poor customer service.

Alarmingly, almost half (46 per cent) of those surveyed who flew with Wizz Air reported issues with their flight, with delays a particularly common issue.

According to Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) data, 63 per cent of the airline’s flights were on time in the last year. Around 2 per cent of its flights were delayed by over three hours - higher than most of its rivals.

The Hungarian airline received low star ratings across the board, scoring just one star out of a possible five for customer service.

Wizz Air finished bottom, marking its second consecutive year at the bottom of the survey, with customers complaining about delays and poor customer service

One respondent reported it was ‘impossible to communicate with the airline’ about their flight cancellation, while another said that Wizz Air was ‘extremely unhelpful and unresponsive’ when they needed assistance.

Close behind Wizz Air was Ryanair.

The Irish airline scored just one star for seat comfort, food and drink and customer service. In the latter category, respondents were particularly critical, with one passenger saying the airline ‘treats customers with disdain’.

Jet2, meanwhile, took first spot among short haul airlines for the third consecutive year. The airline topped the table with an impressive customer score of 81 per cent, and received a full five stars for its customer service.

Its passengers reported a largely hassle-free flying experience, with 80 per cent of respondents who flew with Jet2 reporting no problems. Of those who experienced a hold up to their flight, 84 per cent reported that staff were helpful during the delay.

Jet2 took first spot among short haul airlines for the third consecutive year. The airline topped the table with an impressive customer score of 81 per cent, and received a full five stars for its customer service

Jet2 also has among the lowest rate of last-minute cancellations of any airlines in the survey, with just 0.5 per cent cancelled at short notice, according to CAA data.

In joint second for short haul flights, with a customer score of 74 per cent, was Norwegian and Icelandair. The carriers climbed an impressive four and five places respectively from last year. 

Which?’s latest airlines survey comes as fares hit record highs in the last year and many airlines posted substantial profits following the challenges of the pandemic.

According to the Office for National Statistics, average UK airfares were as much as £713 last summer - and for these prices, customers should be seeing excellent service across the board.

Rory Boland, editor of Which? Travel, said: ‘Air fares have soared in recent years, and the bare minimum passengers should expect in return for their hard-earned cash is a reliable service, with friendly, easy to access customer support when they are let down.

In joint second for short haul flights, with a customer score of 74 per cent, was Norwegian (pictured) and Icelandair
Icelandair (pictured) climbed an impressive five places from last year's ranking

‘While the likes of Jet2 continue to excel in this regard, our survey shows that passengers of many airlines are sadly being shortchanged - with high rates of last minute cancellations, abysmal customer service and sneaky extra fees for luggage hiking up the final price.’

A Wizz Air spokesperson said: ‘We do not consider the findings of this report to be representative or an accurate reflection of our performance today, which is among the strongest in Europe.

'We have been honest about our performance in summer 2022, which was not up to our standards.

'We have invested more than £90 million to rectify this and have made significant improvements which the results of this survey fail to recognise, but are evident from independent data, as well as our own.’

A spokesperson for British Airways said: 'We always work hard to get our customers to where they need to be on time.

'Like all airlines though, over the last year we’ve experienced several factors outside of our control that have had an adverse impact on our customers, such as adverse weather and Air Traffic Control industrial action.

'We apologise to customers for any disruption they’ve faced.’

A spokesperson for Ryanair said: ‘Ryanair has industry leading punctuality with avg. on-time performance of 87 per cent in 2023, despite UK punctuality being severely impacted by the inefficient NATS and its incompetent CEO, whose ATC system has collapsed twice this year delaying thousands of flights and millions of passengers travelling to/from the UK.’

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiWmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay90cmF2ZWwvYXJ0aWNsZS0xMzExNjk2My9iZXN0LXdvcnN0LXNob3J0LWhhdWwtYWlybGluZXMtQkEuaHRtbNIBXmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay90cmF2ZWwvYXJ0aWNsZS0xMzExNjk2My9hbXAvYmVzdC13b3JzdC1zaG9ydC1oYXVsLWFpcmxpbmVzLUJBLmh0bWw?oc=5

2024-02-24 00:01:00Z
CBMiWmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay90cmF2ZWwvYXJ0aWNsZS0xMzExNjk2My9iZXN0LXdvcnN0LXNob3J0LWhhdWwtYWlybGluZXMtQkEuaHRtbNIBXmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay90cmF2ZWwvYXJ0aWNsZS0xMzExNjk2My9hbXAvYmVzdC13b3JzdC1zaG9ydC1oYXVsLWFpcmxpbmVzLUJBLmh0bWw

Jumat, 23 Februari 2024

Nvidia Is Now a $2 Trillion-Dollar Company Thanks to AI Dominance - IGN

Nvidia, the tech company best known for its gaming and graphics GPUs, has officially hit a $2 trillion market valuation, closing at the market cap for the first time today and becoming the first chipmaker to cross the milestone.

The announcement comes less than a year after the company reached the $1 trillion market cap and a little over a week after it was reported that the company reached $1.83 trillion, becoming the fourth most valuable company in the world, beating out Amazon and Alphabet for the spot.

The announcement comes just two days after Nvidia reported its Q4 earnings for the 2024 fiscal year. In the earnings report, Nvidia revealed that the company's quarterly revenue increased by 265%, noting that it made a record-breaking $60.9 billion in revenue last year, marking a revenue increase of 126% compared to 2022.

Nvidia's financial milestones come with no surprise. While the crypto and PC graphics cards markets have cooled, the tech giant has become a leader in AI, becoming a key chip supplier for companies looking to implement artificial intelligence in some capacity. Additionally, Nvidia will soon launch its next flagship AI chip, the HGX H200, promising more memory capacity and bandwidth, allowing it to handle "massive amounts" of data for generative AI.

Nvidia joins Microsoft and Apple as the three US-based companies to reach the $2 trillion market cap. Despite companies like Microsoft looking to make its own AI chips and rely less on Nvidia, a recent report from Reuters claims that Nvidia is working on a new $30 billion business unit that will focus on creating custom AI chips for companies.

Taylor is a Reporter at IGN. You can follow her on Twitter @TayNixster.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiXWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmlnbi5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZXMvbnZpZGlhLWlzLW5vdy1hLTItdHJpbGxpb24tZG9sbGFyLWNvbXBhbnktdGhhbmtzLXRvLWFpLWRvbWluYW5jZdIBAA?oc=5

2024-02-23 21:15:49Z
CBMiXWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmlnbi5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZXMvbnZpZGlhLWlzLW5vdy1hLTItdHJpbGxpb24tZG9sbGFyLWNvbXBhbnktdGhhbmtzLXRvLWFpLWRvbWluYW5jZdIBAA

Kamis, 22 Februari 2024

Vice Media to lay off hundreds of workers and stop publishing on its site - The Guardian

Vice plans to lay off hundreds of employees next week and stop publishing on Vice.com, according to a memo sent to staffers by Bruce Dixon, the Vice Media chief.

On Friday, Dixon confirmed that “several hundred” staffers would be laid off and that the brand “will no longer publish content on vice.com”. He said the company is transitioning to a “studio model”.

“This decision was not made lightly,” Dixon wrote, adding that those affected will be “notified about next steps early next week”.

The memo also noted that Refinery29, another media brand owned by Vice, “will continue to operate as a standalone diversified digital publishing business, creating engaging, social first content”.

“As you know, we are in advanced discussions to sell this business, and we are continuing with that process. We expect to announce more on that in the coming weeks,” Dixon said.

Reports of the layoffs come less than a year after the media company was rescued from bankruptcy by being acquired by a consortium of buyers from Fortress Investment Group.

The Hollywood Reporter revealed on Thursday that multiple employees at Vice were concerned that the company was considering closing down its news website. Various Vice editors reportedly met with staff members and told them that management has yet to provide clarity on the situation.

Speaking to staff members in a conference call on Thursday, Josh Visser, the Vice News executive editor, said that he had asked the company’s executives to clarify emerging rumors of a potential website closure but had not yet received a response.

“I don’t know more than you guys besides being able to read faces and notice who is not replying to my messages,” Visser said, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

Visser described the situation as “very upsetting”, adding: “Our website and our work being pulled down would be completely reprehensible … I cannot even understand any business reasons why you would do something like that,” the Hollywood Reporter reports.

After previous cuts to several shows and dozens of layoffs in November last year, Vice Union said on Twitter/X: “We can no longer express shock and surprise that VICE has determined its only way forward is to lay people off.

“As has been the case in previous layoffs, VICE has once again decided to let go of the very same people who have worked tirelessly to turn it into a respected, award-winning media company.”

Writing on X on Thursday, Vice senior staff writer Anna Merlan said: “Working at Vice has been … so interesting and I will certainly look back on it … I think the ruckus today and the digging by media reporters encouraged a lot more transparency and more quickly than the company would have otherwise done, so thank you all for that.”

In recent weeks, the media industry has gone through sweeping layoffs, with major cuts at NowThis and the Intercept. In a statement last week, the NowThis Union revealed that nearly 50% of the workforce was laid off while the Intercept cut 15 positions.

Last fall, Condé Nast, which owns multiple outlets including the New Yorker, Vogue, Wired, Vanity Fair and Architectural Digest, said that it was laying off 5% of its employees. Similarly, Vox Media said that it was cutting approximately 4% of its workforce after slashing its headcount by 7% at the beginning of 2023.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiUWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9tZWRpYS8yMDI0L2ZlYi8yMi92aWNlLW1lZGlhLWxheW9mZnMtY2Vhc2UtcHVibGlzaGluZ9IBUWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9tZWRpYS8yMDI0L2ZlYi8yMi92aWNlLW1lZGlhLWxheW9mZnMtY2Vhc2UtcHVibGlzaGluZw?oc=5

2024-02-22 22:46:00Z
CBMiUWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9tZWRpYS8yMDI0L2ZlYi8yMi92aWNlLW1lZGlhLWxheW9mZnMtY2Vhc2UtcHVibGlzaGluZ9IBUWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9tZWRpYS8yMDI0L2ZlYi8yMi92aWNlLW1lZGlhLWxheW9mZnMtY2Vhc2UtcHVibGlzaGluZw