Minggu, 03 April 2022

Manchester Airport: Travellers miss flights amid chaos - BBC

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Travellers have criticised the ongoing "chaos" at Manchester Airport after several missed their flights following staff shortages.

One woman missed a flight to see her mum for the first time since lockdown despite queuing for three hours.

Donna Mayfield said the situation was "horrendous", while another traveller saw "customers and staff in tears".

Manchester Airport apologised and admitted passengers' experiences fell "below the standard we aim to provide".

Travellers at the airport have faced long queues for check-in and security over the past month, with some missing flights at the start of the Easter school holidays.

An airport spokesperson said: "Our whole industry is facing staff shortages and recruitment challenges at present, after the most damaging two years in its history.

"The removal of all travel restrictions after two years, coupled with the start of the summer travel season, has seen a rapid increase in passenger numbers, which is putting an enormous strain on our operation."

Large queue at airport
Jordan Ikin

Ms Mayfield was due to fly out to see her 83-year-old mother in Spain on Saturday, after they could not meet in the past two years due to coronavirus restrictions.

"She's very, very upset, which is the only reason why I have booked on another flight today because I was just going to get refund on my flights.

"To be in a queue is bad enough anyway [but] you can see that people are getting more and more frustrated.

"I do sympathise with the staff, it's not like the staff weren't trying to do their best."

Reputational damage

Other travellers told the BBC that the situation at the airport was "shambolic" and "shameful".

One man said he spent three hours in the security fast track lane without moving and missed his flight.

"It's not good for the travel industry or for the local Manchester economy… If I treated my customers like they did, I'd be out of business."

Another man, who spent seven hours at the airport before missing his flight, said he saw "sick on the floor with no one clearing it up" as people queued in a "boiling hot confined area".

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Councillor Pat Karney recently blamed a "failure of management", saying the airport should have prepared for a "very quick" rise in travel demand.

A spokesperson for Manchester Airport, which is part-owned by the region's councils, said: "We are doing all we can to recruit the staff we need to meet this demand, but this is taking time due to the lengthy vetting and training processes involved."

The airport said it would also "continue to support" baggage handling agents, who are facing similar challenges.

Elsewhere, passengers faced delays at Heathrow Airport, which said the disruption was due to Covid documentation checks required by destination countries and higher numbers of passengers.

But travellers also reported problems due to staff shortages and e-gate passport checkpoints.

Presentational grey line

Why not follow BBC North West on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram? You can also send story ideas to northwest.newsonline@bbc.co.uk

Related Internet Links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiOWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbWFuY2hlc3Rlci02MDk3NDI2NtIBPWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbWFuY2hlc3Rlci02MDk3NDI2Ni5hbXA?oc=5

2022-04-03 15:21:55Z
1315164704

Ministers prepare to take control of Gazprom retail arm within days - Sky News

The government is preparing to nationalise Gazprom's British supply arm within days amid a stand-off between the Russian state-controlled energy firm and a Wall Street banking giant.

Sky News has learnt that ministers are drawing up plans to take Gazprom Marketing & Trading Retail (GM&T) into public hands if it fails to reassure financial counterparties about the nature of an apparent change of ownership signalled by its parent company last week.

The move to take control of the UK subsidiary, which could cost taxpayers billions of pounds, may happen as soon as this week, according to one industry source.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Where will the UK get its energy?

It would be among the most significant corporate repercussions so far in Britain arising from Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions regime subsequently introduced by the government in an attempt to punish Vladimir Putin.

The Gazprom division supplies roughly 30,000 customers, including many NHS hospitals, local authorities, large retailers and industrial users of gas.

In total, it supplies more than 20% of the gas used by British companies - a growing number of which have been deserting it in recent weeks.

Placing Gazprom Energy into Ofgem's special administration regime (SAR) would make Gazprom Energy - as the division is known - the second utility to be absorbed by UK taxpayers, following the insolvency late last year of Bulb Energy, the domestic supplier.

More from Business

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

November: Bulb goes into administration

The cost to the public purse of maintaining Gazprom Energy's existing supply contracts was estimated by Bloomberg News last month to be about £4bn.

If accurate, that would make it significantly costlier than Bulb's collapse.

Bloomberg also reported that Teneo Restructuring was being lined up as special administrator.

If customers' existing contracts with Gazprom Energy were not honoured, it would force them to source gas at much higher spot prices which have spiked in recent months and in particular since the start of the war in Ukraine.

The potential insolvency of the Gazprom unit comes at a politically sensitive moment for Boris Johnson's government, which is preparing to launch a range of policies aimed at ensuring the independence of Britain's energy supply.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How Russia affects our energy bills

Last week, Kwasi Kwarteng, the business secretary, signed off the appointment of former BP UK chief Peter Mather to join his department's board as Whitehall tightens its focus on energy supply resilience.

A government spokesperson said: "The UK is in no way dependent on Russian gas, which makes up less than 4% of our supply. Our highly diverse sources of gas supply and a diverse electricity mix ensures that households, businesses, and heavy industry get the energy they need.

"We are aware that Gazprom Energy has a large presence in the non-domestic energy retail market.

"Businesses and organisations should exercise their own commercial judgement with regards to energy supply contracts they have in place at the moment."

One energy industry executive said it was still not certain that Gazprom Energy would need to be taken into public ownership, but said the division's fate rested on ongoing discussions between the company and Citi, which acts as its clearing bank.

On Friday, Gazprom Group announced that it had "ceased its participation" in the British arm, but without providing details of any new owners.

GM&T posted a statement on its website saying it was "not in a position to comment on the new ownership structure" but that it "remains operationally independent".

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Putin: Gas payments to switch to Russian roubles

"We source our gas in the European wholesale markets in exactly the same way as other market participants, and since Q1 2021 we have not received gas under long-term contracts with Russia.

"GM&T, given its significant role within both the energy trading and B2B energy retail sectors, fully recognises the material impact we have in regard to the UK and European financial and energy markets, and thereby the economy.

"We are therefore steadfastly committed to mitigating any adverse impacts, working very closely at present with the UK Energy Regulator ('Ofgem') and other UK government agencies to manage these risks."

It said it would comment further "in due course".

Gazprom has seen its sponsorship deal with European football's governing body, UEFA, cancelled since the Ukraine invasions, while a number of cabinet ministers, including Health Secretary Sajid Javid, have urged departmental stakeholders to stop using energy supplied by the company.

Citi did not respond to two emails seeking a response on Sunday, while Ofgem declined to comment.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L21pbmlzdGVycy1wcmVwYXJlLXRvLXRha2UtY29udHJvbC1vZi1nYXpwcm9tLXJldGFpbC1hcm0td2l0aGluLWRheXMtMTI1ODE0ODjSAWtodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvbWluaXN0ZXJzLXByZXBhcmUtdG8tdGFrZS1jb250cm9sLW9mLWdhenByb20tcmV0YWlsLWFybS13aXRoaW4tZGF5cy0xMjU4MTQ4OA?oc=5

2022-04-03 13:48:22Z
1348305417

Sabtu, 02 April 2022

Furious woman takes Camelot to court after they refuse to pay her £1m Lotto 'jackpot' - Daily Record

A devastated woman has said she is taking Camelot to court after they refused to pay her £1m Lotto 'jackpot' she won on a scratchcard.

The firm claims Joan Parker-Grennan never won and said there had been a 'technical issue'.

The furious 53-year-old was overjoyed when she found she had a winning online scratchcard on a £20Million Online Spectacular game in 2015.

And she was stunned to see she’d landed a million, reports the Mirror.

But when Joan contacted Camelot to claim, they told her there had been a “technical issue” that meant the game displayed numbers in the wrong boxes. So she only won a tenner.

After years of arguing with the company – fined millions last month for separate technical glitches on its mobile app – furious company bookkeeper Joan launched a legal claim in 2021.

Her lawyers are now set to take Camelot to High Court.

Joan, who lives with husband Dave, 60, in Boston, Lincolnshire, said: “My solicitors have already offered them the chance to settle and pay £700,000, £800,000 or £900,000.

“They took the game offline within a day of me making the claim. They told me in an email it was a glitch.”

Camelot ran the National Lottery for 28 years but was told last month it was losing it to a Czech company.

It claims software behaved “erroneously” during Joan’s “win”.

First 20,000 users were told their winning tickets were losing tickets when they scanned a QR code.

A separate glitch affected 22,000 players who bought single tickets but got two and were charged for both.

In the game the top row of numbers were matched to those beneath. Joan matched two 15s for a tenner but also two ones for a million.

Last month Camelot was fined £3.15m by the Gambling Commission for technical issues on its mobile app.

Joan’s £1million claim is for “monies due under the terms of a consumer contract between the parties and/or damages for breach of a consumer contract”.

She is toying with ideas of what she’d do with any winnings. She said: “I’d like a kitchen island and we could invest but we’re more likely to spend it helping others.”

Top news stories today

Camelot said the incident related to “a very small number of National Lottery players who had a problem when playing the £20Million Cash Spectacular online Instant Win Game, relating to how the game animation displayed.

“The outcome of every National Lottery Instant Win Game play is pre-determined at time of purchase, and the animation is purely for entertainment purposes.

“The game had been on sale less than 12 hours when we became aware of the issue and immediately disabled it.

"There is a hearing in June but a trial date has not yet been set.”

Don't miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond - Sign up to our daily newsletter here .

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiW2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5cmVjb3JkLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstd29ybGQtbmV3cy9mdXJpb3VzLXdvbWFuLXRha2VzLWNhbWVsb3QtY291cnQtMjY2MTk4NzPSAQA?oc=5

2022-04-02 16:58:07Z
1357784094

Kwasi Kwarteng to probe Chinese deal for microchip factory - This is Money

Kwasi Kwarteng looks set to intervene in the Chinese takeover of Britain's leading semiconductor maker. 

The Business Secretary is under pressure to act after national security advisers appeared to back Newport Wafer Fab's sale. 

The deal continues to cause alarm among industry experts and politicians who are horrified an important UK manufacturer was sold to a Chinese firm without scrutiny – especially as the world is battling a microchip shortage. 

The Mail understands Kwarteng is now looking at new powers to investigate the sale, which could even result in it being reversed. 

Under pressure: Kwasi Kwarteng looks set to intervene in the Chinese takeover of Britain's leading semiconductor maker

It would be the first major test of the National Security and Investment Act's provision that allows ministers to call in takeovers of strategic companies after they have already gone through. 

And it comes as Kwarteng weighs up whether to approve a number of foreign deals, including the £2.6billion sale of Ultra Electronics to US private equity group Advent International and Viasat's £5.4billion bid for Inmarsat. 

The Government has typically taken a strong line on Chinese investment – refusing to include Huawei in the 5G rollout.

Dutch group Nexperia snapped up Newport Wafer Fab for £63million last year. But Nexperia is owned by Chinese electronics company Wingtech, whose shareholders include state-funded investors. 

Nexperia was already a major shareholder before the deal. 

Managers at Newport Wafer Fab begged the Government to intervene – and Boris Johnson asked national security adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove to weigh up whether the deal was a threat. 

Lovegrove concluded it was not but Kwarteng can step in, with sources suggesting he may do so 'within months'. Newport Wafer Fab is the UK's biggest producer of microchips, an essential part of all electronic devices. 

But it does not focus on new or emerging products, instead producing technology that has been around for years.

Newport Wafer Fab is the UK's biggest producer of microchips

However, a source told the Mail the firm is strategically important, saying: 'The tech isn't that advanced. But we need to look at sovereign industrial capability.' 

A slew of industrial, aerospace and defence firms have been sold off in recent years, raising alarm bells in the military, Westminster, unions and workers. 

These include Cobham to Ultra's suitor Advent in a £4billion deal last year, which resulted in Cobham being split up and much of it sold off within 18 months. 

Although Newport Wafer Fab was in financial trouble, industry groups including a consortium led by former Imagination Technologies boss Ron Black were interested in buying it and pumping in new investment. 

Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, said failing to oppose the deal was an 'error' and called on ministers to 'protect what's left of our semiconductor industry'.

Former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said it was 'ridiculous' not to intervene. And Ciaran Martin, the former head of the National Cyber Security Centre, said last year that the takeover was 'puzzling' and 'inconsistent' with the Government's stance on Beijing. 

Newport Wafer Fab had more than 400 staff in 2020 with a turnover of almost £50million before the pandemic. The Business Department said: 'The Government is considering the case and no decisions have been made.' 

Nexperia said: 'Nexperia has safeguarded Newport Wafer Fab's role within the UK's semiconductor industry and has been delivering on the plans to invest in the site to make it as successful as its Manchester Wafer Fab.'   

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoaXNpc21vbmV5LmNvLnVrL21vbmV5L21hcmtldHMvYXJ0aWNsZS0xMDY3NzI1NS9Ld2FzaS1Ld2FydGVuZy1wcm9iZS1DaGluZXNlLWRlYWwtbWljcm9jaGlwLWZhY3RvcnkuaHRtbNIBAA?oc=5

2022-04-01 20:51:54Z
1365917930

Fuel poverty looms for many amid dramatic hike in cost of living - Sky News

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9WlRXUXIxaVlNelnSAQA?oc=5

2022-04-01 19:18:27Z
1354218887

Jumat, 01 April 2022

Warning of fresh energy bill shock in October as prices rise again - BBC

Woman comparing
Getty Images

People have been warned to brace for another huge rise in energy bills when the next cap takes effect in October.

This could add another £629 a year to a typical bill, on top of Friday's unprecedented £700-a-year rise, says energy consultancy Cornwall Insight.

The expected rise in bills just as colder weather kicks in has prompted calls for fresh government support to those struggling to pay.

Energy prices have been affected by the Ukraine war and pressure on suppliers.

The most up-to-date prediction from Cornwall Insight would, if accurate, push annual energy bills for a household using a typical amount of gas and electricity to up to £2,600 from October.

A typical bill is expected to fall back to the current level in summer 2023, although longer-term forecasts are tricky.

Bill Bullen, the boss of Utilita, warned that elderly people and children were at serious risk over the next winter because of a lack of heating.

"We are going to see an extra £500 or £600 added to bills in October, and frankly the chancellor's going to have to fund that entirely for low-income households," he told the BBC.

"He won't be able to afford to take this problem away for everybody... but for customers who can't respond to that price [increase], that's where the help needs to be targeted."

The warning comes on top of a huge rise in what energy suppliers can charge customers from Friday. The £693 a year rise in a typical energy bill will affect 18 million households, with 4.5 million customers on prepayment meters facing an even bigger increase of £708 a year.

At the same time, a host of bill hikes take effect with council tax, water bills and car tax going up for some on 1 April.

Minimum wage rates are rising which, along with some financial support from the government, is partially softening the blow.

Prices in general are rising at their fastest rate for 30 years, but the sudden increase in the cost of energy is the most significant for individuals.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

New official figures suggest four in 10 bill-payers have been finding it very, or somewhat, difficult to afford their energy costs.

The governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, said the country is facing the biggest single shock from energy prices since the 1970s.

It is the largest increase, by far, in the energy regulator Ofgem's price cap, since it was introduced.

The cap, set every six months for England. Wales and Scotland, is designed to protect domestic customers from the volatility of wholesale energy prices.

Chris O'Shea, chief executive of Centrica, which owns the UK's largest supplier British Gas, said his business was supporting struggling customers and was giving grants to those most in need.

"We would love to do more. The reality is that for a retail energy company, the market has gone through quite a change, and profits have reduced quite substantially," he told the BBC's Big Green Money Show.

However, he accepted that profits had risen sharply for the heavily taxed exploration arm of the business.

Energy price cap graphic
Alamy

The Office for National Statistics said that low earners, renters, parents, people with disabilities, unemployed people and divorcees were least able to afford a bill shock.

The government has said it was taking "decisive action" to help people with the cost of living, including a £200 reduction to energy bills in October - which needs to be paid back in instalments, and a £150 reduction in council tax bills for 80% of billpayers.

Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Sir Keir Starmer, the leader of the Labour party, branded the government's response as "pathetic".

He accused the government of forcing people to choose between heating their homes or eating.

He said that the Labour party would introduce a one-off windfall tax on the profits of oil and gas companies and use the money to help households struggling to cope with rising energy bills.

But Chancellor Rishi Sunak told the BBC's Newscast: "I'm confident in what we've done. I know it's tough for people. We're facing a very difficult situation with the price of things going up and I want to do what we can to ameliorate some of that, but I'm also honest with people that we can't ameliorate all of it, sadly."

Banner saying 'Get in touch'

Are you affected by issues covered in this story?

Bottom line for Get in touch request

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2J1c2luZXNzLTYwOTU5MzU30gEwaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYnVzaW5lc3MtNjA5NTkzNTcuYW1w?oc=5

2022-04-01 17:26:00Z
1354218887

Joe Biden raids US oil reserve after failing to bring Gulf partners on side - Financial Times

Joe Biden’s decision to unleash a torrent of crude from the emergency US reserve is a gamble that he can tame petrol prices in time for November’s midterm elections. But it is also an acknowledgment that American partners in the Gulf are not about to help him out.

The president on Thursday ordered the release of an “unprecedented” 180mn barrels of crude from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve in an attempt to offset supply disruptions triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and push down fuel prices for American motorists.

“This is a moment of consequence and peril for the world and pain at the pump for American families,” Biden said as he announced the release. “The bottom line is, if we want lower gas prices, we need to have more oil supply right now.”

The announcement came just hours after Opec, the Saudi Arabia-led oil alliance, again ignored calls from western politicians including Biden and UK prime minister Boris Johnson to pump oil more quickly.

Oil prices settled lower after the SPR announcement, with international benchmark Brent down 5 per cent to $108 a barrel but still almost twice the level a year ago. National average petrol prices sat at $4.23, according to the American Automobile Association, up roughly 50 per cent in the past year and just below record levels hit in recent weeks.

The US will release 1mn barrels a day from its reserve for the next 180 days, dwarfing the size of two previous releases Biden announced in November and early March.

But analysts say the SPR move could backfire, conveying panic to an already hot market and leaving the world’s largest emergency oil stockpile dangerously low at a time of mounting threats to supply.

At the same time, the release may be insufficient if supply losses from Russia, the world’s biggest petroleum exporter, end up being larger than the market expects. The International Energy Agency last month said as much as 3mn barrels a day could be shed from Russian output because of US sanctions and the reluctance of buyers to keep loading its crude.

An escalation of the war that triggers a European energy embargo, or American secondary sanctions on other Russian oil importers akin to those that affected Iranian oil from 2011 to 2015, could overwhelm even Biden’s “historic” SPR release, analysts said.

“They have brought the bazooka,” said Helima Croft, global head of commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, referring to the latest US move. “But the question is, is it going to be sufficient?”

Biden on Thursday also demanded America’s oil producers, now enjoying bumper cash flows thanks to the surging crude price, increase supply too.

“Enough of lavishing excessive profits on investors in payouts and buybacks when the American people are watching,” he said, castigating producers that remain under pressure from Wall Street to return capital to shareholders.

He called on Congress to implement a “use it or lose it” policy that would see operators forfeit leases on federal lands if they opt not to drill on them. US output sits at about 11.6mn b/d, well below its pre-Covid highs of nearly 13m b/d.

Until extra production materialises later this year, according to Biden, the stock release will serve as a “wartime bridge” to help cool prices.

US petrol prices hit record levels in March

To replenish the SPR, the Department of Energy plans to buy back the crude released from the reserve. A person briefed on the administration’s thinking said it may do so at a price of $80 a barrel at some point in future.

Counter-intuitively, although the SPR release announced this week is intended to drive short-term prices lower, analysts said the guarantee of repurchases should push up some futures prices, which are currently trading at steep discounts against oil contracts for delivery in the near term.

“This action certainly makes me more bullish on crude in 2023 and 2024,” said Dan Pickering, founder of Houston investment firm Pickering Energy Partners. “The government’s going to be out in the market, buying those barrels back. It’s adding supply in the near term, and creating demand in the future.”

The release is also a tacit admission by Washington that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — longstanding US partners with spare production that could swiftly be raised to push down prices — remain reluctant to help Biden tame the oil price rally.

Relations between the two Gulf states and Washington have deteriorated since Biden entered the White House with a promise to make Saudi Arabia a “pariah state” after the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The US has also not offered the kind of extended security partnership sought by the two Gulf states, said analysts in the region.

“They’re very upset by these ongoing attacks on their critical infrastructure,” said RBC’s Croft, a former CIA analyst, referring to recent missile and drone strikes by Yemen’s Houthi rebel group. “They are concerned about the United States trying to negotiate a narrow nuclear deal with Iran . . . They believe their security interests are exposed.”

Although the US provided some Patriot missiles to Riyadh last month, Croft wrote in a recent note that it was “hard to see” how Washington could sign a nuclear deal with Iran while also convincing Saudi Arabia to “jettison” its relationship with Russia, an Opec+ partner, in favour of providing “gas price relief” to Americans.

The price of West Texas Intermediate crude broke $100 a barrel after Russia invaded Ukraine

Analysts at JPMorgan said the SPR release highlighted a structural shortage in the market that would only be exacerbated by drawing down the emergency stockpile.

“We view today’s announcement of the largest SPR release in US history as the clearest indication yet that the future availability of production capacity is at risk owing to limited shale and Opec+ spare capacity coupled with prevailing strong demand,” they wrote in a note.

The move would “only serve to squeeze global spare capacity further”, suggesting “upside” to price forecasts for Brent to average $125 a barrel in 2022 and $150/b in 2023, “even if relations with Russia normalise”.

Previous emergency SPR releases have followed major supply disruptions, including the Gulf war in 1991*, Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the Libyan civil war in 2011.

The limit of spare capacity in the US was thrown into sharp relief by Thursday’s announcement. According to IEA statutes, member states must hold reserves equivalent to at least 90 days of net oil imports. For the US, that translates to 315mn barrels, according to calculations by RBC Capital Markets.

Once the latest drawdown is complete, there will be 353mn barrels remaining in the SPR, resulting in a buffer of just 38mn barrels.

That leaves Biden with little room for manoeuvre should an escalation of the war in Ukraine lead to further market disruption — in the form of wider US sanctions or retaliation by Moscow — and remove even more Russian oil from the global market.

Pickering said the move smacked of “gamesmanship around the midterms” and was the last time the government could “pull the SPR lever” without leaving the emergency stockpile dangerously low.

Any future efforts to shelter consumers from the oil price increase would have to take the form of gasoline tax holidays or direct payments to buyers to offset petrol prices, he said, moves that might simply spur more demand.

“You’re depressing the price artificially,” said Pickering. “You’re not really solving the problem.”

* This article has been amended since original publication to correct a reference to the invasion of Iraq

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzY3NDhlNWFlLWE4YWMtNDRlNC04OWU2LTFkZWQzOTc4YmJjY9IBAA?oc=5

2022-04-01 05:46:45Z
1355964733